Market Bounces Back as Bernanke Promises Low Rates

By Robert Perrego, at 5:01 pm on February 24th, 2010

Last week the Federal Reserve raised the discount rate to 0.75% sparking fears that the federal funds rate might be next in line for a hike.  JP Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) gained 2.43% and Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) added 2.44% to lead the Dow Jones Industrial Average higher on the day.  The market spiked higher just after 10 a.m. – minutes after Fed Chairman Bernanke began two days of testimony in front of a congressional panel.  As Bernanke stressed that last week’s move did not mean the federal funds rate was going higher anytime soon, stocks responded strongly, pushing the DJIA higher by almost 90 points within 25 minutes.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average regained some of yesterday’s lost ground closing higher by 91.75 points (+0.89%, 10,374.16).  The S&P 500 added 10.64 points (+0.97%, 1,812.51) and the tech heavy Nasdaq 100 led the three indexes, up 18.69 points (+1.04%, 1,812.51)

The finance sector responded strongly as Bernanke spoke and on news that key senators are opposed to limits on commercial banks making bets with their own capital.  More trading news was made today as an SEC panel voted 3-2 to limit short selling on a down-tick on stocks that are down more than 10% on a day.  The new rule would make short positions only able to be entered on an uptick if a stock is down over 10% from its previous daily close in one day, and for all of the next trading day.  Quite frankly, this rule change is more for political cover for the SEC as they try to look like they are doing something.  The markets dropped drastically last year and all of a sudden, people looking for someone to blame pointed fingers at short sellers and the SEC.

The Effects of Short Selling

Fact is, short-selling adds liquidity to the market and just like with any trade, if the short-seller is wrong they can lose money.  An all to common public perception that short sellers cause stocks to go down too much is unfounded as there has to be a reason to bet that stock is going lower in the first place.  Short sellers will put a short position on if they think the stock is too expensive.  Some reasons for this might be that the company’s fundamentals are bad, the economy is headed lower or the stock has risen too far, too fast.

A way to think about short selling is; 1) Stocks are competing with each other for invest-able funds, and those that have better reason to be invested in get those funds and go higher, 2) Current investors in short-seller favored stocks may sell them to buy the more attractive stock, 3) The company that loses this invest-able funds ‘popularity contest’ are judged to be weaker and with no buying interest to counter-act regular selling, the stock goes lower, 4) On their own, short sellers would not be able to push a stock lower, as they have to ‘buy-in’ these shorts sooner or later, creating a ‘built-in’ demand for the stock.  Only the sellers of ‘long stock’ can sell the stock and walk away.  The short sellers have to be there to buy the stock back in and are nothing but future demand potential for that stock.

So if short selling cannot, by itself, make a stock go down, what is the SEC actually accomplishing here?  As long as their is sufficient liquidity in a stock, short selling is not the reason a stock is going down.  The SEC dropped the ball on policing ‘naked short selling.’  Naked short sales increase the supply of an issuer’s (company’s) effective outstanding stock, and is also illegal.  A lot of people should either be in jail right now, or should have paid large fines made money on naked short selling over the past few years.  If the SEC had done their job properly with the naked short sellers they would not be trying to save face right now by tinkering with legitimate short selling.  Period.

New York spot gold dropped $6.80 an ounce to $1,096.70 (-0.62%, 4:30 p.m.) and Nymex crude regained the $80 a barrel plateau, up $1.31 to $80.17 a barrel (+1.66%, 4:23 p.m.).  The PowerShares DB US Dollar Index (NYSE: UUP) dropped 0.20% (-$0.05, $23.76) and this throws a red flag.  Gold dropped and is acting weak while the dollar is dropping, which says to me gold has internal weakness.

Looking at the chart of the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (NYSE: GLD) we see that it failed to take out the resistance level at $111 and has rolled over and traded down to $107.36.  The stochastic oscillator looks to be topping out and rolling lower too.  The GLD did break the downtrend line from it’s all time high and this is a positive.  The next technical test for the GLD will be to see if it closes below $104 (twice in a row).  If this happens we have a lower low and strong trading stocks do not do that.  I suspect the ETF is going to trade sideways for awhile and consolidate.  The GLD will head down to $104 and flirt with breaking it – if it breaks for two consecutive sub $104 closes that is a sell signal.  If it holds and starts to head back up – buy more.

Bernie Goes Down on all 11 counts… no plea bargain

By Robert Perrego, at 3:18 pm on March 10th, 2009

Life in prison is what Bernie Madoff is to expect in two days when he pleads guilty to all 11 counts of all types of fraud dating back to the 1970’s.  The whole gang is in there; mail fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud, money laundering and somewhere there might be a count of jaywalking too.  As far as the King of Super-Villians goes, Lex Luthor, who was Superman’s nemesis, is probably taking notes right now and waiting for the book.  Bernie’s take over three plus decades is estimated at $43 to $50 billion.  Now that is a serious haul!

It was reported on Monday that Mr. ‘Made-off’ with everyones money of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC was in plea bargain negotiations which prompted me to ask ‘WHY?’

Why would Bernie, who burned everyone from the very rich to charities to pension funds around the world be ‘bargaining’ and what did he have to bargain with?

Well, let me leave you with this thought – both his sons who worked for the firm are not charged with any wrong doing even though one ran the trading operations that supposedly made a whole lot of ‘no trades’.

The SEC is FINALLY going to be watching the Fox that is guarding the Henhouse

By Robert Perrego, at 11:20 am on March 9th, 2009

After Bernie ‘Made-off’ with $50 billion of every one’s money and R. Allen Stanford played golf and cricket with everyone else’s, the SEC is now double checking these managers in hopes to prevent future scams, fraud and Ponzi schemes.

The SEC is now sending inquiries to investors in funds in order to double check what the fund reports to the investor against what the fund reports to the SEC.

Brilliant!  This sounds like someone is finally doing their job.  Shame it did not happen like… about… lets say $60 billion ago.

Why Buy the Card – Soon Enough You can Buy the Team

By Robert Perrego, at 2:11 pm on December 18th, 2008

Over the past months there has been a bit more dealing in the business of buying and selling professional sports teams.  Wayne Huizenga has already sold 50% of the Miami Dolphins to Stephen Ross founder of The Related Companies L.P., a real estate development firm, and they are putting the touches on selling 45 of the remaining 50% now.  I guess there will be a real estate developer in Miami with a few dollars after all.

Art Modell sold 30% the Pittsburgh Steelers – to his sons – after pulling the team off the market recently as he got no decent offers from the general public.  The Chicage Tribune, owners of the Chicago Cubs, are hemorrhaging  money like every other newspaper but cannot seem to get a decent bid for the team outside of Mark Cuban, who has problems of his own with the SEC.  Things may not be all that bad for Mark as it seems the SEC could not catch a cold in Soldier Field these days even if Governor Blagojevich was trying to sell them one.  Besides, baseball does not seem to want basketballs version of Al Davis in their clubhouse.  And speaking of Al Davis – is he ever going to give the people of Oakland a break and sell the Raiders to someone who knows something about football?

Investors are questioning whether or not the New York Times should sell the only asset they own that is not mortgaged or striking out like A-Rod in the bottom of the ninth, that asset ironically being The Boston Red Sox.

You can always buy a hockey team – just look for the team in Canada that plays in a town where the team roster is 10% of the population.  The problem here is hockey does not seem to make money anymore.

Believe it or not, the latest economic implosion has hit the wealthy extra hard.  The investors that had exposure to the CDS melt down and the more complicated mortgage securities were hedge fund investors and that group is made up of the wealthy.  On top of it all – the last slap upside the head was Bernie Madoff sticking the country club set with another $50 billion shafting, notably New York Met’s owner Fred Wilpon.

Sports teams are not cheap but the lack of liquidity and the beating corporations and wealthy people are taking these days will make them cheaper in the future.

On that note, the New York Yankees open their new stadium next year and they only need another $350 million in loan guarantees and bonds from the City of New York to complete a place where you can buy Coor’s Light and it will lighten your wallet faster than all the new taxes proposed by Mayor Bloomberg and Governor Patterson.

The one good piece of news?  Sports jerseys are getting cheaper.  Buy one today and maybe the team will get bought and moved tomorrow so you can look like an idiot in last years jersey!