The Fed balance sheet and Inflation

By Robert Perrego, at 2:06 pm on April 24th, 2009

Much has been said about the Fed blowing up its balance sheet in the past months and how it should ‘inevitably’ lead to inflation.  This inflationary threat is what has all the ‘gold bugs’ loading up on gold ETF’s and the stocks of gold mining companies.  I should know – I am in this camp.

Well, today the Fed released its balance sheet and one item shows that the Fed took $74 billion of toxic debt onto its balance sheet from Bear Stearns and AIG and that these assets have already depreciated by $9.6 billion.

This buying of assets by the Fed means they pay out dollar bills into the financial system increasing the supply of dollars in circulation.  This increase in the supply of dollars floating around is what decreases the value of all the other dollars.  This is result of the Law of Supply – as the supply increases, what is out there decreases in relative value.  The gold bugs are saying that with more dollar bills out there that number of dollar bills you trade for an ounce of gold, which is more difficult to put into circulation, increases, i.e. the price per ounce goes up.  This would be true for all purchases made with the dollar.  Voila – Inflation.

The Fed contends that they can control this future inflation simply by selling or removing these assets from their balance sheet in the future at the ‘appropriate’ time.  A recent conference held by some of the Fed policy and decision makers left one guy, who knows a little something about the Fed, a bit confused. This guy was none other than Paul Volcker, one of the most famous inflation fighters of all time.  If what the Fed intends to do to control inflation confuses Volcker as to how well it will work… well, that is a bit scary.

By not taking sides in whether the current decision makers at the Fed can control future inflation through their deft machinations, I have one question;  ‘What about that $9.6 billion?’

Seems to me its gone and the greenbacks are still out there.  The Fed cannot sell the toxic assets to get those dollars out of circulation – that capacity is gone for good.

That my friends feeds inflation right there.

So what else did the Fed buy?  What is it all worth now?  What will it be worth in the future and how many dollars can the Fed pull back in out of circulation when these toxic debts are worth a lot less?

Maybe this is why the worlds largest holder of dollar bills, China, is quietly buying gold.

So What Did You Expect? They Are The Best Traders on the Street! Market Recap April 14, 2009

By Robert Perrego, at 4:15 pm on April 14th, 2009

Nothing like a little salt in the wound…

This one is dedicated to all those that bought the Goldman Sachs secondary stock offering today  …  see ‘ya suckers!

Goldman priced at $123 and then briefly traded in that general neighborhood, but once the stock broke lower it dropped fast on heavy selling volume.

Goldman closed down $14.23 at $115.92 after the firm that has been knocking the cover off the ball in the trading department made another nice trade – they sold the public 40,650,407 shares for $5 billion.  And guess what happened then?  Did you think these guys would be selling you the stock cheap?  It’s Goldman!

The Dow closed down 138 at 7920, the S&P 500 closed down 17.19 at 841.54 and the Nasdaq closed down 14.36 at 1322.31.  Red across the board!

Citigroup, AIG and E-Trade, thats right, Citigroup, AIG and E-Trade finished up very strong on this ‘bizarro world’ trading day where Goldman and Wells Fargo drop while the poster children for ‘flip-a-coin for a bankruptcy’ posted 7+, 5+ and 4+ percent gains.

On the political front Obama spent the morning recapping how the financial meltdown evolved, in case you missed it in the papers or on the news over the past 6 months, and then gave us all construction tips about how building our ‘house’ would be better done on rock than sand.  At about this time the market started breaking down into its lowest trading range of the day.

The Obama show was followed by the Bernanke show where he answered about half the questions starting with ‘well that is the Treasury’s department’ which made everyone wonder if Geithner was not there as he was busy doing his taxes.

There was not much movement in oil or gold as both closed with marginal losses and the big stock news of the day is that Dendreon’s prostrate cancer vaccine testing shows it has great potential… ahhh, just in time for the tax season deadline, right?

Lobbying = Contracts = Revenues

By Mark Pason, at 10:30 am on April 10th, 2009

Transparency is a friend of the curious.  Although Sunshine Laws have allowed the public access to government data, it was never organized very well in past years.  We are finally seeing it organized and displayed in usable formats.  When you lift up the rocks, you’ll find some interesting data out there.

According to USA Spending.gov, the Lockheed Martin Corporation, The Boeing Company and Northrop Grumman were the top three receipiants of Federal government contract awards for FY 2009.  What’s interesting to see is what these government contracts mean to each company’s LTM Revenues.

Percentage of Revenue from Gov't Contracts

% of Revenue from Federal Gov't Contracts

Goverment dollars are responsible for almost 20% of Lockheed Martin’s LTM Revenues, 8.5% of Boeing’s revenunes and about 8% of Northrop Grumman’s revenues.  These contracts are obviously very important to the financial health of all three companies.  With a change of Administration and policy, we may not see these three at the top of list in the next few years to come.

If you’re wondering what it costs to get these contracts, just check out the data from OpenSecrets.org.  In 2008, Lockheed Martin spent $15.5mm lobbying the Federal government to get $8.2bb in contract awards.  Boeing spent $16mm for $5.2bb and Nortrop Grumman spent almost $21mm for $2.6bb in contracts .  This is effecient and effective spending.  All three companies spent less than 1% on lobbying for a big chunk of government cheese.

A little money can go a long way In Washington.

When You’re Too Big To Fail, Where is the Bottom?

By Jim Di Liberto, at 9:56 am on April 9th, 2009
With the government throwing cash around the banking industry like Pollock splatters paint, Washington has basically said it’s going to back those ‘too big to fail’ banks for the forseeable future.  Who else, besides the Treasury, has faith in these former titans of finance?  Well, the executives themselves!
A look at insider transactions over the last year or so at two of the biggest banks to get a helping hand from Uncle Sam – Citigroup and Bank of America – shows that several directors and indicators are taking advantage of the plunging stock price to double down on their holdings in open market stock purchases.
First, lets look at BAC:
BAC Buys and Sells, with Stock Price

BAC Buys and Sells, with Stock Price

When, in mid January, BAC was in the middle of its two-month slide form over 15 to under 6, CEO Ken Lewis and Board Member Rob Tillman led the buyers on Jan. 20 with 200,000 shares each.  Directors O. Temple Sloan, Jackie Ward, John Collins and William Barnet also rode the wave, buying between 16,000 and 62,000 shares each – a half-million share stock buy in one day.  The next two days also saw crazy activity, as the ever-lovable John Thain, Brian Moynihan, Frank Bramble and Thomas Ryan bought anywhere from 25,000 to 95,000 shares each. All this activity took place after a two-month lull, from early November 08 until late January 09, while yje execs watched prices plummet before sweeping up some cheap shares.

All that buying came at the end of a slide.  Though there was some volatility the next few days, the price did continue to go down, allowng Sloan to buy another 95,000 shares at an even lower price two weeks later.  He was joined by not only by Lewis, Moynihan and Ryan but also Gen. Tommy Franks (another BAC board member), Virgis Colbert and Charles Rossotti to collectively grab 312,000 shares between Feb. 2 and Feb. 6.  By the tmie the stock started picking up a little in March, they had collective scooped up over 1.1 million shares.

Citigroup saw an even bigger swing:

C Buys and Sells, with Stock Price

In the middle of Citigroup’s dive from over 14 to under 4 in November 2008, CEO Vikram Pandit swallowed up 850,000 shares mid-dive, while John Havens grabbed 250,000 and Brian Leach 130,000 shares.  Robert Ryan, Ed Kelly  and Richard Parsons joined over the next few days with almost 400,000 shares.

But the stock price still had further to fall – and a couple more insiders were able to make even bigger bets.  Board member Roberto Hernandez swooped in and bought 6 million shares on March 3 as Citi hovered around a buck and a quarter.  Manuel Medina-Mora bought 1.5 million one day later.  As the share prices tanked, these guys didn’t dump but kicked in more of their cash into their companies

Granted, when your share price is less than a slice of pizza, how much are you really risking?  Still, these open market moves – the heavy buys clearly outnumbering any attempts to dump stock, make for interesting trends to watch.

Editor’s Note:  The author owns some shares of Citigroup.

Wasn’t Me!

By Robert Perrego, at 5:46 am on April 8th, 2009

(sung to Shaggy’s ‘Wasn’t Me’)

Feds came in and they caught us red-handed

AAA ratings all over the floor

Picture us, and all these derivatives, defaulting more and more

Getting paid on the counter with Fannie Mae (wasn’t me)…

Cozy AAA on the sofa for AIG (wasn’t me)…

Not coming clean in the shower with Freddie Mac (wasn’t me)…

Got my rating caught in Lehman’s crack (wasn’t me)…

Well the Attorney General of Connecticut thinks it was you… Moody’s, S&P and Fitch.  Three big cheaters.